Performance
Sequoia Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Sequoia Elementary in Manteca, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
11%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
2%
Exceeded the standard
192
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 11% | 3% | 95 |
| Grade 8 | 12% | 0% | 97 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 25% 577 tested | 15% 582 tested | 11% 192 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 27% 303 tested | 11% 305 tested | 9% 102 tested |
| Male | 23% 274 tested | 18% 277 tested | 14% 90 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 32% 22 tested | 29% 24 tested | - |
| Black or African American | 5% 19 tested | 5% 19 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 24% 444 tested | 13% 447 tested | 11% 141 tested |
| White | 29% 68 tested | 19% 68 tested | 12% 25 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 23% 495 tested | 13% 500 tested | 9% 164 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 37% 82 tested | 24% 82 tested | 25% 28 tested |
| Homeless | 10% 63 tested | 5% 65 tested | 0% 15 tested |
| Military family | 0% 16 tested | 0% 16 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 10% 165 tested | 6% 170 tested | 2% 52 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 11% 161 tested | 6% 162 tested | 2% 49 tested |
| Long term English learners | 0% 34 tested | 0% 34 tested | - |
| At risk of becoming a long term English learner | 0% 38 tested | 0% 39 tested | 0% 18 tested |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 57% 82 tested | 28% 82 tested | 22% 36 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 36% 22 tested | 18% 22 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 26% 247 tested | 13% 252 tested | 10% 88 tested |
| Never an English learner | 24% 330 tested | 15% 330 tested | 13% 104 tested |
| English only | 23% 308 tested | 15% 308 tested | 11% 95 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 3% 58 tested | 3% 58 tested | 0% 14 tested |
| No reported disability | 27% 519 tested | 16% 524 tested | 12% 178 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 16% 98 tested | 10% 99 tested | 10% 39 tested |
| Parent high school graduate | 25% 212 tested | 13% 215 tested | 12% 69 tested |
| Parent some college | 28% 135 tested | 18% 135 tested | 12% 42 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 33% 85 tested | 23% 86 tested | 16% 32 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 11% 18 tested | 0% 18 tested | - |
View 12 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 25% 577 tested | 15% 582 tested | 11% 192 tested |
| Not foster youth | 25% 575 tested | 15% 580 tested | 12% 191 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 25% 561 tested | 15% 566 tested | 12% 187 tested |
| Not homeless | 27% 514 tested | 16% 517 tested | 12% 177 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 31% 412 tested | 18% 412 tested | 15% 140 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 23% 391 tested | 12% 394 tested | 8% 125 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 34% 53 tested | 21% 53 tested | 31% 16 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 24% 49 tested | 16% 49 tested | 12% 17 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 21% 28 tested | 7% 28 tested | - |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 28% 18 tested | 25% 20 tested | - |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 42% 19 tested | 26% 19 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 6% 17 tested | 6% 17 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
18%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
54%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
262
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 33 | 6% | 39% | 39% | 15% | 55% |
| Grade 1 | 30 | 17% | 40% | 37% | 7% | 43% |
| Grade 2 | 32 | 13% | 38% | 41% | 9% | 50% |
| Grade 3 | 29 | 10% | 31% | 48% | 10% | 59% |
| Grade 4 | 32 | 25% | 34% | 22% | 19% | 41% |
| Grade 5 | 29 | 21% | 34% | 21% | 24% | 45% |
| Grade 6 | 35 | 11% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 69% |
| Grade 7 | 19 | 11% | 16% | 47% | 26% | 74% |
| Grade 8 | 23 | 17% | 22% | 30% | 30% | 61% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (25 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economically Disadvantaged | 240 | 16% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 51% |
| No Special Education Services | 239 | 13% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 56% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 227 | 13% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 56% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 227 | 13% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 56% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 225 | 12% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 56% |
| Male | 141 | 13% | 34% | 35% | 18% | 52% |
| Female | 121 | 16% | 28% | 37% | 19% | 56% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 71 | 3% | 21% | 42% | 34% | 76% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 45 | 29% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 36% |
| Homeless | 41 | 27% | 39% | 22% | 12% | 34% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 38 | 18% | 37% | 37% | 8% | 45% |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 37 | 19% | 43% | 27% | 11% | 38% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 35 | 23% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 43% |
| LTEL | 35 | 6% | 26% | 43% | 26% | 69% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 34 | 21% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 44% |
| Asian | 29 | 28% | 31% | 31% | 10% | 41% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 28 | 11% | 32% | 43% | 14% | 57% |
| EL - 5 years in program | 25 | 12% | 36% | 32% | 20% | 52% |
| Special Education Services | 23 | 30% | 39% | 22% | 9% | 30% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 22 | 0% | 14% | 45% | 41% | 86% |
| EL - 4 years in program | 21 | 14% | 33% | 29% | 24% | 52% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 19 | 32% | 32% | 21% | 16% | 37% |
| Primary language: Punjabi | 12 | 17% | 33% | 42% | 8% | 50% |
| Military | 11 | 18% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 27% |
| White | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.