Performance
Sequoia Middle — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Sequoia Middle in Redding, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
24%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
9%
Exceeded the standard
144
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 24% | 9% | 144 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 43% 427 tested | 29% 426 tested | 24% 144 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 54% 207 tested | 31% 206 tested | 28% 64 tested |
| Male | 32% 218 tested | 27% 218 tested | 18% 78 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 29% 24 tested | 17% 24 tested | - |
| Asian | 59% 17 tested | 29% 17 tested | - |
| Black or African American | 27% 15 tested | 13% 15 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 42% 95 tested | 27% 95 tested | 25% 32 tested |
| White | 45% 232 tested | 31% 232 tested | 25% 76 tested |
| Two or more races | 41% 41 tested | 33% 40 tested | 6% 16 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 39% 325 tested | 26% 324 tested | 22% 108 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 56% 102 tested | 38% 102 tested | 28% 36 tested |
| Military family | 64% 14 tested | 38% 13 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 17% 18 tested | 6% 18 tested | - |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 13% 16 tested | 6% 16 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 73% 11 tested | 55% 11 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 38% 29 tested | 24% 29 tested | - |
| Never an English learner | 43% 397 tested | 29% 396 tested | 24% 135 tested |
| English only | 42% 389 tested | 29% 388 tested | 24% 133 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 10% 73 tested | 5% 73 tested | 4% 26 tested |
| No reported disability | 50% 354 tested | 34% 353 tested | 28% 118 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 16% 19 tested | 5% 19 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 30% 73 tested | 16% 73 tested | 10% 20 tested |
| Parent some college | 40% 116 tested | 27% 116 tested | 23% 44 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 53% 107 tested | 37% 106 tested | 29% 49 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 78% 37 tested | 54% 37 tested | 54% 13 tested |
View 15 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 43% 427 tested | 29% 426 tested | 24% 144 tested |
| Not foster youth | 43% 421 tested | 29% 420 tested | 24% 142 tested |
| Not homeless | 43% 417 tested | 30% 416 tested | 24% 141 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 42% 413 tested | 29% 413 tested | 23% 139 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 44% 408 tested | 30% 407 tested | 25% 137 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 40% 170 tested | 26% 170 tested | 22% 54 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 41% 79 tested | 29% 79 tested | 23% 26 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 35% 75 tested | 27% 75 tested | 9% 11 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 58% 62 tested | 45% 62 tested | 32% 22 tested |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 32% 28 tested | 22% 27 tested | 9% 11 tested |
| American Indian or Alaska Native (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 35% 20 tested | 20% 20 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 50% 16 tested | 19% 16 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 21% 14 tested | 14% 14 tested | - |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 54% 13 tested | 31% 13 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 62% 13 tested | 54% 13 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
28%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
50%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
18
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 8 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (10 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 16 | 44% | 13% | 19% | 25% | 44% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 16 | 44% | 13% | 19% | 25% | 44% |
| No Special Education Services | 16 | 38% | 13% | 19% | 31% | 50% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 15 | 47% | 13% | 13% | 27% | 40% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 14 | 43% | 14% | 14% | 29% | 43% |
| Female | 11 | 36% | 0% | 27% | 36% | 64% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 1 year in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Male | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.