Performance
Sutter Middle — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Sutter Middle in Folsom, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
60%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
33%
Exceeded the standard
526
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 60% | 33% | 526 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 71% 1,592 tested | 58% 1,601 tested | 60% 526 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 76% 751 tested | 58% 753 tested | 58% 250 tested |
| Male | 66% 841 tested | 58% 848 tested | 62% 276 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 86% 472 tested | 82% 474 tested | 82% 152 tested |
| Black or African American | 50% 32 tested | 21% 33 tested | 8% 13 tested |
| Filipino | 69% 32 tested | 66% 32 tested | 67% 12 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 49% 260 tested | 34% 262 tested | 37% 71 tested |
| White | 68% 620 tested | 52% 622 tested | 56% 227 tested |
| Two or more races | 77% 168 tested | 53% 170 tested | 61% 49 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 46% 333 tested | 30% 339 tested | 35% 108 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 78% 1,259 tested | 65% 1,262 tested | 67% 418 tested |
| Homeless | 24% 17 tested | 11% 18 tested | - |
| Military family | 38% 13 tested | 38% 13 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 10% 90 tested | 11% 98 tested | 3% 30 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 10% 89 tested | 9% 88 tested | 4% 27 tested |
| Long term English learners | 5% 19 tested | 5% 19 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 89% 216 tested | 76% 216 tested | 76% 71 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 93% 145 tested | 87% 146 tested | 88% 50 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 66% 306 tested | 56% 314 tested | 54% 101 tested |
| Never an English learner | 72% 1,286 tested | 58% 1,287 tested | 61% 425 tested |
| English only | 70% 1,141 tested | 54% 1,141 tested | 58% 375 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 19% 152 tested | 10% 152 tested | 18% 44 tested |
| No reported disability | 76% 1,440 tested | 63% 1,449 tested | 64% 482 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent high school graduate | 36% 80 tested | 19% 80 tested | 39% 28 tested |
| Parent some college | 54% 196 tested | 34% 196 tested | 44% 72 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 69% 446 tested | 56% 447 tested | 61% 145 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 81% 827 tested | 70% 834 tested | 68% 268 tested |
View 17 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 71% 1,592 tested | 58% 1,601 tested | 60% 526 tested |
| Not foster youth | 71% 1,590 tested | 58% 1,599 tested | 60% 525 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 71% 1,579 tested | 58% 1,588 tested | 60% 524 tested |
| Not homeless | 71% 1,575 tested | 58% 1,583 tested | 61% 521 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 75% 1,502 tested | 61% 1,503 tested | 64% 496 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 485 tested | 56% 485 tested | 60% 177 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 89% 425 tested | 87% 425 tested | 86% 135 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 56% 169 tested | 42% 170 tested | 35% 51 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 43% 135 tested | 34% 137 tested | 38% 50 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 80% 135 tested | 59% 136 tested | 71% 38 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 35% 91 tested | 18% 92 tested | 40% 20 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 66% 47 tested | 43% 49 tested | 47% 17 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 53% 34 tested | 20% 35 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 64% 33 tested | 29% 34 tested | 27% 11 tested |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 24 tested | 75% 24 tested | 73% 11 tested |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 44% 18 tested | 17% 18 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 57% 14 tested | 27% 15 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
25%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
53%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
100
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 32 | 13% | 38% | 34% | 16% | 50% |
| Grade 7 | 36 | 25% | 22% | 28% | 25% | 53% |
| Grade 8 | 32 | 19% | 25% | 22% | 34% | 56% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (22 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Special Education Services | 90 | 20% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 53% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 89 | 13% | 31% | 29% | 26% | 55% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 67 | 16% | 28% | 33% | 22% | 55% |
| Male | 51 | 22% | 27% | 25% | 25% | 51% |
| Female | 49 | 16% | 29% | 31% | 24% | 55% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 42 | 14% | 21% | 33% | 31% | 64% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 36 | 0% | 31% | 25% | 44% | 69% |
| Asian | 34 | 18% | 26% | 29% | 26% | 56% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 33 | 24% | 27% | 18% | 30% | 48% |
| White | 32 | 9% | 28% | 38% | 25% | 63% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 29 | 31% | 28% | 17% | 24% | 41% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 27 | 33% | 33% | 19% | 15% | 33% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 24 | 21% | 25% | 46% | 8% | 54% |
| Primary language: Russian | 22 | 9% | 32% | 32% | 27% | 59% |
| LTEL | 18 | 6% | 44% | 22% | 28% | 50% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 14 | 7% | 50% | 14% | 29% | 43% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 14 | 71% | 7% | 7% | 14% | 21% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 11 | 64% | 0% | 18% | 18% | 36% |
| Special Education Services | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 3 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Two or more races | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.